As AI takes on more of the work, the easy thing to hand over along with it is the judgment. But the accountability does not move with the labor. When an AI-influenced decision goes wrong, the name on it is still yours. This is a book about staying in the seat where the decision gets made.
A woman in Michigan had just finished her training to become a police officer in Detroit. Then she failed the background check, and the job went away. What the check had flagged was a finding of fraud. Years earlier she had collected unemployment benefits, and a state computer system had decided, on its own, that she had lied to get them. She had never been told. No person had ever looked at her case. No human had decided anything about her at all.
The system was called MiDAS. In the same stretch, the agency laid off nearly its entire fraud-detection unit. The humans who used to make the call were gone, and the call still had been made. It was made wrong most of the time: roughly forty thousand people wrongfully accused, a false-determination rate later placed between eighty-five and ninety-three percent, at least eleven thousand families in bankruptcy. The one thing that finally fixed the machine was the simplest thing imaginable. Put a person back into the decision.
That is the whole of this book in a single case. A consequential judgment was delegated to a system with no accountable human owner, and the cost fell on people who were never in the room where it was decided, because by then there was no room and no one in it. This book is about that room, and about the person who is supposed to be standing in it. It is about the call.
The targeting is real. The exacting expert, the professional watching the crosshairs climb into their craft, the veteran deciding whether to wait it out: all three can feel the dot on their chest, and they are usually the ones being told they have nothing to worry about. But being aimed at is not the same as being replaced. What the model cannot do is the one thing the work cannot proceed without.
The read, the sense of what a situation actually is, of which detail is load-bearing and when the technically correct answer is the wrong one for this person right now, is built only by spending a working life in contact with other people and real consequences. Take the Call is about keeping that read in the seat where decisions are made, holding the line on what only a person can own, and staying accountable in a moment that keeps offering to decide for you.
For the professional who can feel the crosshairs. The exacting expert whose precision was a moat and is watching a tool approximate its surface. The professional one level up from form-filling, watching the work climb toward the machine. And the veteran near the end of a long career, whose judgment the whole institution has quietly been relying on, deciding whether to stay in it or set it down. One question wearing three faces. No technical background required; the argument is about judgment and accountability, not code.
Take the Call is a complete draft in editing, seeking representation. A full manuscript and proposal are available on request.
Its companion volume, for the parent, the teacher, and the leader, is The Wrong Default.